Comments on: Postseason awards

By: cff

cff — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:55:01 +0000

The Dirty is right! Flaherty should be on list over Jack Near, this kid didn’t even play much this year and besides,Bronxville won without him!

By: rockfb1

rockfb1 — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:15:45 +0000

I heard a few weeks ago some of the Rockland coaches wanted to have a senior game for the Rockland players. What happened with that?

By: mister

mister — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:10:12 +0000

No way a Senior Bowl should be played now, its been two weeks that most of the kids who would be in the game have been away from football, and many haven’t played in almost a month. Its too hard to play after being away that long and would be asking for injuries. Plus its winter sports season for many and basketball, hockey, and wrestling practices and scrimmages are underway. If I was a coach I would never let my players play in that game now.

By: go eagles

go eagles — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:17:59 +0000

Under the Stands,

The senior bowl is an opportunity for coaches to see a recruit in person, as most college seasons are over now.

So, it is a recruiting tool, no question.

By: Just a fact

Just a fact — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:44:58 +0000

To be objective, Mamaroneck and definetly Ramapo declined as the season went on. Calling Suffern average when DiMarsico was healthy is underrating their season. Granted Arlington did not have their starting QB, Suffern with DiMarsico almost beat them, which tells you a lot since Arlington finished third in all of AA.

Next year will not be a fair comparison as a barometer for this year’s Suffern team (when DiMarsico was healthy) since they will not have a player like DiMarsico. Suffern has not had a player like that at RB in quite sometime. Next year I expect Suffern to return back to what they were, but I hope I am wrong as well.

By: Overrated

Overrated — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:11:15 +0000

Not bashing Suffern because they did have a good year (probably their best since their 97 championship run) but who did they beat that was good this year? Clarkstown North and South? Ramapo or Mamaroneck? When they played competition they were manhandled! Demarsico is a flat out stud and the TE and WR were very good but they were average everywhere else and the good teams exploited that. i am happy it wasn’t NR and Ramapo again like it always is but Suffern was average this year. Hopefully they can repeat their performance in 2010 so I can eat my words. Good luck

By: Under the stands

Under the stands — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:09:07 +0000

Tape and grades from the past couple of years are going to get kids into College,,, not the senior bowl..

By: football

football — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:43:50 +0000

Mitchell definitely deserves recognition for filling in so well, but you have to give credit to the offensive line of Bronxville who the whole season dominated opponents while running very few plays.

By: Section 1 fan

Section 1 fan — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:40:05 +0000

Section 1 is run so poorly in many sports…now no Senior Game…a free college recruiting tool…I feel sorry for the KIDS whom always seem to be the ones hurt…No wonder Beacon and others may want to go to section 9…we are really hurting in this section for sports organization…Good thing basketball seems to running right…what else really is…

By: rob s

rob s — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:44:29 +0000

say no to a senior bowl sounds like a typical basketball coach…...