I was out of the office the last few days, celebrating Easter and enjoying the new Citi Field for last night’s Mets home opener. I did, however, keep up with the blog the last few days, as well as read through a series of scathing emails from my friends in Port Chester regarding Saturday’s article, which you can read here.
First, let me acknowledge my mistakes. Port Chester never “requested” to enter the Rockland league for football, nor did it “refuse” to rejoin the league with Harrison, Rye and Eastchester. This information was incorrectly reported in Saturday’s edition of The Journal News, and a correction will run in tomorrow’s paper and on LoHud.com. A simple phone call to Port Chester AD Joe Durney would have prevented these mistakes from getting into my story. For that, I apologize.
According to Durney, who’s email is printed below, Port Chester was arbitrarily placed in a league of predominantly Rockland County schools despite its geopraphic proximity and history to Harrison, Rye and Eastchester, and it happened without any resistence from the Port Chester program. The leagues were voted on by athletic directors and approved.
The amazing thing is that this story was not intended to be about Port Chester, nor was I trying to uncover the Crime of the Century in Section 1 Football. To be honest, I could care less which league Port Chester or any team is in. The only reason I mentioned it was because Eastchester coach Fred DiCarlo pointed to it as part of a series of events that cost it a regular season game.
The article was solely meant to shed light on the fact Eastchester was left without a football game by Section 1 and the conference administrators. Making enemies with an entire city wasn’t part of my vision. Eastchester asked for my assistance in spreading the word and helping it find a game, which is what I was attempting to do. I’ve always hesitated to write about Eastchester in fear of readers accusing me of favoritism. Knowing how sacred football games are to high school, this was a worthy cause.
I’m still committed to helping Eastchester find an Oct. 10 game, mainly because nobody else is. And I’d be willing to do this for anybody. If there’s some issue or injustice out there that you feel needs attention being brought to, I’d be happy to offer my help however I can. Never hesitate to email me: kdevaney@lohud.com.
In closing, I’d like to say that this issue will in no way impact my, or The Journal News’, coverage of Port Chester athletics. Unfortunately, I never really knew former coach Drew Ciccoria (although he seems to know a lot about me) and I dealt with coach Greg Domestico a few times during the wrestling season and have tremendous respect for him and the rapport he has with his athletes. What they think of me personally is totally irrelevant to how I do my job.
Below is the emailed response from Port Chester athletic director Joe Durney:
Dear Kevin,
Regarding your article in today’s Journal News:
Port Chester never requested to join the Rockland County-based League A-West group, that was the original placement by virtue of the proposal submitted by the Class A Football Chair, and endorsed by the Class A Football Committee, which was carried by majority vote by the Class A Football ADs. Your implication that Port Chester made a request (and was granted that request) is inaccurate and misleading.
Port Chester never refused to rejoin any league. There is no basis for this statement as there was never a motion on the floor of any decision making group proposing such a move. While there was objection to the alignment proposal during formal deliberations pursuant to the vote, to state that there was a request and refusal is inaccurate and misleading.
Whoever provided you your information did not do so in an objective and accurate manner, and clearly does not understand the governance of Section One Athletics.
While clearly the Section One administrators regret that Eastchester does not have a crossover game, it is not unprecedented when there are so many needs for crossovers due to odd numbers of teams in divisions. We had an identical situation just last year. If it were not Eastchester this year, it would have been some other team in a group of 5 that resulted from an odd number of teams in the Class. That is: due to the number of teams and the number of leagues, and the resulting need for crossovers, if it were not Eastchester, it would have been another team in the league of 5 that came up one game short (which in fact resulted from Yonkers request for relief).
I hope in the future you will consult my office prior to printing information about alleged action that our district has taken when, in fact, such action has not occurred.
Thank you.
Joe Durney
PCRUFSD
District Director
PO Box 246
Port Chester NY 10573